856 (P < 0.05)Ĥ BACKGROUND In the field of PA education, there is a lack of validated formative and summative instruments that can accurately predict future PANCE performance. The strength of correlation between the predicted PANCE score and actual PANCE score demonstrated an R value of 0.79 and an R 2 of In 20, Seven 120 question End of Rotation™ exams (EORE) created by PAEA were administered to students from three PA programs (n=72) ) Pearson coefficient between PANCE and EORE is. The SUMM I, SUMM II, and PACKRAT scores (N = 421) were combined in a regression model to generate a predicted PANCE score.

Although the testing instruments (PACKRAT/PANCE) are used in the United States the same system could be replicated in other countriesģ Overview of paper The scores of the participants from five PA programs were gathered between and to determine correlational strength between PACKRAT and SUMM I and II and the PANCE.

This can be used to determine if students have met graduation requirements in the cognitive domain through summative examinations. Presentation on theme: 'Scott L Massey PhD PA-C Slippery Rock University USA'- Presentation transcript:ġ Scott L Massey PhD PA-C Slippery Rock University USAĬorrelation Between Formative and Summative Examinations and The National Certification Examination For Physician Assistants Scott L Massey PhD PA-C Slippery Rock University USAĢ Introduction The relevance of this paper for participants of IAPAE is to demonstrate how assessment instruments can be used to measure students acquisition of knowledge.

Packrat score to pance